Class action lawsuits

Pixel tracking lawsuits: what they say about data sharing and where each one stands

Pixel tracking is the use of small pieces of hidden code on websites and apps that can send information about what visitors do to other companies, such as Meta or Google. Several lawsuits claim that companies used these tools to share visitors' browsing, health or viewing information without permission. This page lists each lawsuit, what it alleges, and where it stands.

Open for claims now

These settlements are taking claims. Check who qualifies and the deadline on each one.

Read about the CVS Digital Privacy settlement
Read about the Flo Period Tracker Data Privacy Litigation settlement

Claims closed

The deadline to file a claim has passed for these settlements.

  • GameStop settlementGameSpot allegedly used tracking tools to collect users’ browsing data without consent, violating California privacy law.
  • MarinHealth Medical Center settlementMarinHealth shared patients’ sensitive data with Meta Pixel without consent
  • NBA Top Shot settlementNBA Top Shot allegedly shared users’ video viewing data with Facebook without consent, violating the Video Privacy Protection Act.
  • Sutter Health Privacy settlementSutter Health allegedly shared patient PII/PHI with third-party trackers (e.g., Meta, Google) via MyHealthOnline login webpage without consent.

What is pixel tracking on websites and apps?

A tracking pixel is a tiny piece of code, often invisible, that a business adds to its website or app. When you load a page or tap a button, the code can send details about that action to another company, such as an advertising platform. Similar tools, sometimes called software development kits (ready-made code bundles that app makers add to their apps), do the same job inside apps.

Companies use these tools mainly to measure how well their ads work, to understand how people use their sites, and to show ads to people who visited before.

The concern in these lawsuits is what gets shared. The lawsuits say some companies sent information such as pages viewed on health sites, patient login activity, period and pregnancy data, or videos watched, and did so without asking. Some cases rely on laws like the Video Privacy Protection Act, a federal law that limits how businesses share records of the videos a person watches.

Regulators have looked at this practice too. The US Department of Health and Human Services issued guidance on HIPAA and online tracking technologies, which says health care providers covered by HIPAA (the federal health privacy law) should not use tracking tools in ways that disclose protected health information without permission. Separately, the Federal Trade Commission brought a case against Flo Health, alleging the app shared users' health data with outside companies; that matter was resolved by settlement. The private lawsuits listed here, including the Flo Period Tracker data privacy lawsuit, are separate cases, and some may be dismissed or never pay anyone.

Products named in these lawsuits

Being on this list means a lawsuit names the product. It does not mean a court has found anything wrong with it.

  • CVS websites and app
  • Flo Period Tracker
  • GameStop website
  • NBA Top Shot
  • Sutter Health MyHealthOnline
CHIMO
Sign up for updates on new lawsuits
and unclaimed money opportunities
© 2026 Chimo AI Inc. - All rights reserved.
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms and Conditions