Claim Window Now CLOSED

GameStop Class Action Lawsuit

Updated
The lawsuit says trackers on GameSpot.com collected California visitors' IP addresses without consent, in violation of California privacy law. Fandom, which runs GameSpot, denies it.
See settlements you can still claim
Game controller beside a monitor in neon light – GameStop class action

What happens next with the GameStop settlement

The claim deadline passed on April 15, 2026. New claims for this settlement are no longer being accepted.

The court approved the settlement on May 19, 2026. Nothing is paid out until that approval is final.

Payments come after approval, and after any appeals. Anyone who objected to the settlement can ask a higher court to look at it again — an appeal — and that has to finish first. Eligible payments are sent once approval is final, and the stretch from a claim deadline to money in hand often runs a year or more. It varies from one settlement to the next.

Filed this claim with Chimo? The status of your claim is on the claims page in your account.

2026 Class Action Settlements > GameStop Class Action

GameStop Class Action Lawsuit

The GameSpot tracking class action case, Shah v. Fandom, Inc., was filed in January 2024 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (Case No. 3:24-cv-01062-RFL). The lawsuit alleges that Fandom, Inc., which operates GameSpot, used online tracking technologies on the GameSpot website that collected visitors' IP addresses without consent. Fandom denies that it violated any law, and the court did not decide who was right.

Plaintiffs Vishal Shah and Jayden Kim claim that three advertising trackers on the site—GumGum, Audiencerate, and TripleLift—collected visitors' IP addresses and other identifying information for advertising. According to the complaint, each tracker is a “pen register” under section 638.50(b) of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA), and installing them without a court order violated section 638.51(a).

The GameSpot tracking lawsuit details state that the company denied wrongdoing but agreed to resolve the dispute through a class action settlement after litigation and negotiations. The plaintiffs defeated a motion to dismiss, and the parties settled with the help of a mediator, Hon. Robert B. Freedman (Ret.), signing the agreement on October 9, 2025. The court granted final approval on May 19, 2026.

Under the settlement, Fandom agreed to create a $1.2 million settlement fund for eligible website visitors. These GameSpot tracking legal claims apply to people who accessed GameSpot from California during the covered period and whose IP addresses were allegedly collected by website trackers.

Lawsuit Name
Shah v. Fandom, Inc.
Court
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Case Number
3:24-cv-01062-RFL
Judge
Hon. Rita F. Lin
Plaintiffs
Vishal Shah; Jayden Kim
Defendants
Fandom, Inc.
Key Allegation
Alleges that Fandom used three ad trackers on GameSpot to collect California visitors' IP addresses without consent, in violation of California's pen register law (CIPA section 638.51).

GameStop Class Action Settlement - $1,200,000

Fandom, Inc., operator of GameSpot, agreed to create a $1,200,000 settlement fund to resolve claims that its website used tracking technologies to collect visitors' IP addresses without consent.

Under the GameSpot tracking lawsuit settlement, the fund is distributed to eligible claimants after administration costs and legal fees. Payments are made on a pro rata basis, meaning the final amount depends on how many valid claims were submitted. The plaintiffs' preliminary approval motion estimated $130 to $216.67 per class member, based on the administrator's expectation of 3,000 to 5,000 approved claims.

This case is notable because, according to that motion, it was only the second settlement ever reached under California's pen register provisions, CIPA sections 638.50 and 638.51. The lawsuit alleged that three advertising trackers, GumGum, Audiencerate, and TripleLift, collected visitors' IP addresses without consent.

The GameSpot tracking settlement eligibility applies to individuals who accessed GameSpot.com or its subdomains from California between January 5, 2023, and December 16, 2025. Claimants only needed to attest they visited the website during this period—no receipts or proof were required.

The deadline to file a claim was April 16, 2026, and new claims can no longer be filed. The court granted final approval on May 19, 2026, awarding class counsel $399,962.96 in fees and costs and $5,000 to each of the two plaintiffs.

Claims closed: April 15, 2026

Website Class Action Payout: $130–$216.67 (court filing estimate)

Many people searching “how much will I get from the GameSpot tracking lawsuit” want to know the expected payment and timeline. The GameSpot tracking settlement amount per person, paid from the $1,200,000 settlement fund, depends on how many valid claims were submitted.

Estimated payout range: the plaintiffs' preliminary approval motion estimated that eligible class members could receive between $130 and $216.67 each, based on the administrator's expectation of 3,000 to 5,000 approved claims. Because this case uses an attestation-only claim process, participation levels may significantly affect the final payment amount.

Unlike many consumer settlements, no proof of purchase or documentation was required. Eligible claimants only needed to confirm they accessed GameSpot from California during the covered period.

As for the GameSpot tracking settlement payout date, the court granted final approval on May 19, 2026. Its schedule set August 27, 2026, for payments to class members with approved claims, and it ordered the administrator, Epiq, to run a fraud verification process on flagged claims, with a status report due August 13, 2026.

Some settlements take longer due to appeals, claim verification, fraud checks, or check reissues. Payments to eligible claimants are made by check, PayPal, or Venmo, depending on the option selected in the claim form.

CIPA Class Action Payouts

Condé Nast Subscriber Privacy Litigation. Website data sharing / tracking privacy case. Settlement fund: $13.75 million  Allegation: Condé Nast sold subscriber data to third parties without consent.  Actual payout: about $82 per claimant.
$82.00
Website tracking / Meta Pixel privacy case Patient portal pages used tracking pixels that sent data to Facebook and Google.
$50.00
Mirmalek v. Los Angeles Times Communication CIPA tracker lawsuit LA Times installed advertising trackers (TripleLift, GumGum, Audiencerate) on visitors’ browsers without consent.
$5.00
Average Payouts

Website Class Action Eligibility

Understanding GameSpot tracking class action eligibility helped determine whether you qualified as one of the GameSpot tracking class action claimants. Court documents define eligibility based on website activity and location during the class period.

Questions the claim form asked:

  1. Did you access GameSpot.com or its subdomains between January 5, 2023, and December 16, 2025? This confirmed exposure to the alleged tracking technologies.
  2. Were you located in California at the time you visited the site? The lawsuit is based on California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) protections.
  3. Do you attest under penalty of perjury that this information is accurate? This allowed claims without proof while reducing fraudulent filings.

The court certified the class for settlement purposes only, and its order says the settlement is not a finding that Fandom did anything wrong.

You accessed GameSpot.com or its subdomains between January 5, 2023, and December 16, 2025.
You were located in California at the time you visited the site.

FAQ

No. Claimants did not need to have created an account. The settlement class is everyone who accessed GameSpot.com or its subdomains in California and had their information collected by the trackers during the covered dates.

The lawsuit alleges that advertising trackers on the website automatically collected IP addresses and browsing activity when visitors loaded pages.

The notice names three trackers: GumGum, Audiencerate, and TripleLift. The lawsuit says Fandom installed them on visitors' browsers, where each collected IP addresses that are used for targeted advertising.

No. The claim form only required an attestation that the claimant visited GameSpot during the class period. Documentation was not required.

Yes. Even a single visit to GameSpot from California during the covered period could qualify someone to file a claim.

Yes. Each person who individually visited GameSpot from California during the class period could submit their own claim. The claim form allowed each class member to submit only one claim form.

The legal claims are based on the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA), which provides specific protections for people located in California.

Sources

These are the court's own records for this case. They are hosted here unchanged, so you can check anything on this page against the documents themselves.

The full case file is on the court docket: view the docket.

CHIMO
Sign up for updates on new lawsuits
and unclaimed money opportunities
© 2026 Chimo AI Inc. - All rights reserved.
About Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms and Conditions