InSync Staffing, Inc. Class Action Lawsuit
A class action filed on August 19, 2026, says InSync Staffing did not give its employees proper meal and rest breaks or pay them for all the time they worked. Nothing has been decided, and there is no settlement.
Get updates on this lawsuit
We'll email you when something changes in this case, such as a settlement or a date to file a claim.
By signing up, you agree to get emails from Chimo about this case and about other class actions and settlements. You can unsubscribe at any time.
Where the InSync Staffing, Inc. lawsuit stands
A lawsuit has been filed, and the people who brought it are asking the court to let them represent everyone affected, which is what makes it a class action. Nothing has been decided yet, and there is no claim to file.
Many class action lawsuits end without a settlement, so this one may never open for claims.
Settlements you can still claim in October 2026
Visa & Mastercard
$380
Neutrogena (Illinois Only)
$731
Generic Drug Makers (State AGs)
$59
InSync Staffing, Inc. Class Action Lawsuit
A lawsuit against InSync Staffing says its employees worked before their shifts started, after they ended and through their lunch breaks without being paid.
The lawsuit, brought by the law firm Zakay Law Group, APLC, says InSync Staffing required employees to do work before and after their scheduled shifts and during their off-duty meal breaks. According to the lawsuit, the company did not pay for this "off-the-clock" time, meaning time spent working under the employer's control without being paid.
The lawsuit says this broke several parts of the California Labor Code, the state law that sets rules for how workers are paid and treated. It says InSync Staffing failed to pay minimum wage for all hours worked, failed to pay overtime, failed to provide required meal and rest breaks, failed to give accurate itemized pay stubs, failed to pay wages on time, failed to reimburse employees for work expenses they had to cover, and failed to let employees inspect their employment records.
None of these claims has been proven. The case, No. 26STCV26237, is pending in the Los Angeles County Superior Court of the State of California. It was filed on August 19, 2026.
Who the InSync Staffing Wage and Hour Class Action Covers
The lawsuit is brought on behalf of InSync Staffing employees who, it says, were affected by the pay and break practices described in the complaint. The group a lawsuit asks to represent is called the proposed class.
The court has not decided who, if anyone, is included, or which jobs and dates a class would cover. That decision, called class certification, comes later in the case.
FAQ
No, not yet. The lawsuit was filed on August 19, 2026, and there is no settlement or court judgment. A claim process exists only if a case settles or the workers win and the court approves a way to pay the class. None of that has happened, and it may never happen.
There is nothing you need to file right now, because no claim process exists. If you worked for InSync Staffing, you may want to keep your own pay stubs and schedules. If you have questions about your own situation, you can speak with a lawyer of your choosing.
You can sign up for updates on this page. If the case settles and a claim process opens, we will let you know what it requires and the deadlines that apply. Settlements are usually also announced through a formal notice approved by the court.
There is no set timeline. Wage and hour class actions often take a year or more, and sometimes several years, to reach a settlement or a decision. Some cases are dismissed and never pay anything. The court's schedule and the parties' choices decide the pace.
Class certification is the court's decision on whether a case can go forward on behalf of a whole group of people instead of just the workers who sued. In this case, the court has not made that decision, so it is not yet decided who, if anyone, is part of the class.