33 Days Left to Join
Sign Up for Balance of Nature Class Action Lawsuit
Balance of Nature class action lawsuit is currently open:
Those who meet eligibility criteria should apply before the deadline March 10, 2026. Consumers allege Balance of Nature misled buyers by overstating health benefits and ingredient quality of its supplements, causing people to overpay.
Open Class Actions > Balance of Nature Class Action
Balance of Nature Class Action Lawsuit
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Balance of Nature alleging the company misled consumers about the health benefits, ingredient quality, and nutritional value of its supplements.
The Balance of Nature Supplements class action case was brought by plaintiff Vernita Morris on behalf of consumers who purchased Balance of Nature Fruits, Veggies, and Fiber & Spice products. Filed in September 2025, the lawsuit is titled Morris v. Evig, LLC d/b/a Balance of Nature, Case No. 25PH-CV-01551, in the Circuit Court of Phelps County, Missouri.
The Balance of Nature Supplements lawsuit details focus on claims that marketing and advertising overstated “proven” health benefits and premium ingredient representations, causing consumers to overpay. These Balance of Nature Supplements legal claims include deceptive trade practices, breach of warranty, and unjust enrichment. Plaintiffs proved their claims using a combination of documentary evidence, expert analysis, and regulatory records, rather than showing individual consumer harm.
After roughly one year of litigation and negotiations, the parties reached a proposed settlement in 2026. Class counsel from multiple firms negotiated a $9.95 million settlement fund, with official settlement terms outlined in the court-approved settlement agreement and claim documents filed in the case docket.
The Balance of Nature Supplements class action case was brought by plaintiff Vernita Morris on behalf of consumers who purchased Balance of Nature Fruits, Veggies, and Fiber & Spice products. Filed in September 2025, the lawsuit is titled Morris v. Evig, LLC d/b/a Balance of Nature, Case No. 25PH-CV-01551, in the Circuit Court of Phelps County, Missouri.
The Balance of Nature Supplements lawsuit details focus on claims that marketing and advertising overstated “proven” health benefits and premium ingredient representations, causing consumers to overpay. These Balance of Nature Supplements legal claims include deceptive trade practices, breach of warranty, and unjust enrichment. Plaintiffs proved their claims using a combination of documentary evidence, expert analysis, and regulatory records, rather than showing individual consumer harm.
After roughly one year of litigation and negotiations, the parties reached a proposed settlement in 2026. Class counsel from multiple firms negotiated a $9.95 million settlement fund, with official settlement terms outlined in the court-approved settlement agreement and claim documents filed in the case docket.
Lawsuit Name
Vernita Morris, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Evig, LLC d/b/a Balance of Nature
Court
Circuit Court of Phelps County, Missouri
Case Number
25PH-CV-01551
Judge
Hon. William E. Hickle
Plaintiffs
Vernita Morris
Defendants
Evig, LLC d/b/a Balance of Nature
Key Allegation
Deceptive marketing misrepresented supplement ingredients/quality and “proven” health benefits, causing consumers to overpay.
Balance of Nature Class Action Settlement - $9,950,000
Balance of Nature agreed to resolve the lawsuit primarily through a nationwide $9.95 million cash settlement, rather than admitting wrongdoing or committing to specific labeling or marketing changes. The company agreed to compensate eligible consumers who purchased Balance of Nature Fruits, Veggies, or Fiber & Spice supplements during the class period, using a streamlined two-tier claims structure that allows payments with or without proof of purchase.
A unique feature of this settlement is its household-based cap, limiting recovery to one claim per household, regardless of how many products were purchased. The settlement also allows flexible proof, including online order histories from Balance of Nature, Amazon, or Walmart, making it easier for consumers to qualify. Claims are subject to auditing to prevent fraud, but no medical harm or product defect must be shown—only qualifying purchases.
Another notable aspect is that any unclaimed settlement funds revert to the company, rather than being distributed to third-party charities. The settlement also expressly excludes personal injury claims, focusing solely on alleged deceptive advertising and marketing practices.
A unique feature of this settlement is its household-based cap, limiting recovery to one claim per household, regardless of how many products were purchased. The settlement also allows flexible proof, including online order histories from Balance of Nature, Amazon, or Walmart, making it easier for consumers to qualify. Claims are subject to auditing to prevent fraud, but no medical harm or product defect must be shown—only qualifying purchases.
Another notable aspect is that any unclaimed settlement funds revert to the company, rather than being distributed to third-party charities. The settlement also expressly excludes personal injury claims, focusing solely on alleged deceptive advertising and marketing practices.
Deadline for filing a claim: March 10, 2026
Supplements Class Action Payout: $8 - 30 per household
Consumers wondering how much will I get from the Balance of Nature Supplements lawsuit should know the payout structure is intentionally standardized to balance fairness with fraud prevention.
Claimants in this settlement may receive between $4 and $30, depending on proof of purchase, number of units claimed, and how many valid claims are submitted overall.
The price per unit—$6 with proof or $4 without proof—was negotiated to reflect a partial refund of the alleged price premium, not a full product refund. Plaintiffs argued consumers overpaid based on marketing claims, and the per-unit amounts represent a court-approved estimate of that premium spread across millions of purchases.
The maximum unit limits are a key feature:
- Up to 5 units with proof (max $30)
- Up to 2 units without proof (max $8)
These caps exist to prevent over-claiming, ensure broad participation across the class, and keep the settlement fund available to as many households as possible. The case also uses a one-claim-per-household rule, meaning frequent buyers cannot disproportionately drain the fund.
The Balance of Nature Supplements settlement payout date is expected about 45 days after final court approval, following claim review, fraud checks, and resolution of any appeals. Delays are common due to court schedules and verification processes.
Claimants in this settlement may receive between $4 and $30, depending on proof of purchase, number of units claimed, and how many valid claims are submitted overall.
The price per unit—$6 with proof or $4 without proof—was negotiated to reflect a partial refund of the alleged price premium, not a full product refund. Plaintiffs argued consumers overpaid based on marketing claims, and the per-unit amounts represent a court-approved estimate of that premium spread across millions of purchases.
The maximum unit limits are a key feature:
- Up to 5 units with proof (max $30)
- Up to 2 units without proof (max $8)
These caps exist to prevent over-claiming, ensure broad participation across the class, and keep the settlement fund available to as many households as possible. The case also uses a one-claim-per-household rule, meaning frequent buyers cannot disproportionately drain the fund.
The Balance of Nature Supplements settlement payout date is expected about 45 days after final court approval, following claim review, fraud checks, and resolution of any appeals. Delays are common due to court schedules and verification processes.
False Advertising Class Action Payouts
$70
$65
$25
Average Payouts
Supplements Class Action Eligibility
You may qualify under Balance of Nature Supplements class action eligibility if you purchased certain products during the class period. The claim form asks targeted questions to confirm Balance of Nature Supplements class action claimants meet court-approved criteria.
The eligibility rules in this case were designed by the court and the parties to match the legal theory of harm and make the settlement workable at scale.
First, eligibility is tied to purchase of specific products during a defined time window because the lawsuit alleges economic overpayment caused by advertising, not physical injury. The class period (March 28, 2019–September 2025) reflects when the challenged marketing was active and when sales data was available to verify purchases.
Second, the household-based rule exists because the defendant sold primarily direct-to-consumer subscriptions. Court filings note that many customers purchased repeatedly under the same account or address, so limiting recovery to one claim per household prevents duplicate recovery and preserves funds for broader participation.
Third, the proof vs. no-proof tiers were created to balance access and accuracy. Proof of purchase increases confidence in claim size, justifying higher unit caps, while allowing claims without proof ensures consumers who no longer have records can still participate.
Finally, unit caps reflect the court’s view of damages as a price-premium estimate, not a full refund. The goal was proportional recovery across millions of purchases without individualized damage hearings, enabling timely distribution and final approval.
The eligibility rules in this case were designed by the court and the parties to match the legal theory of harm and make the settlement workable at scale.
First, eligibility is tied to purchase of specific products during a defined time window because the lawsuit alleges economic overpayment caused by advertising, not physical injury. The class period (March 28, 2019–September 2025) reflects when the challenged marketing was active and when sales data was available to verify purchases.
Second, the household-based rule exists because the defendant sold primarily direct-to-consumer subscriptions. Court filings note that many customers purchased repeatedly under the same account or address, so limiting recovery to one claim per household prevents duplicate recovery and preserves funds for broader participation.
Third, the proof vs. no-proof tiers were created to balance access and accuracy. Proof of purchase increases confidence in claim size, justifying higher unit caps, while allowing claims without proof ensures consumers who no longer have records can still participate.
Finally, unit caps reflect the court’s view of damages as a price-premium estimate, not a full refund. The goal was proportional recovery across millions of purchases without individualized damage hearings, enabling timely distribution and final approval.
Purchased Balance of Nature Fruits, Veggies, or Fiber & Spice between March 28, 2019–September 2025
Purchases made in the U.S.
Supplements Class Action Claim Form
The Supplements class action claim form is quick and simple with Chimo. Some settlements take longer due to court approval, appeals, or fraud checks, but Chimo streamlines the process so you can get your share fas. Here's how to file a claim against Supplements:
1
Check eligibility now by answering a few quick questions
2
Tell us where you want your check sent
3
Submit your form before March 10, 2026
You'll receive confirmation and updates on your claim status.
FAQ
Yes. Purchases made via Amazon or Walmart qualify, and you can use order confirmations or account order history as proof.
The settlement counts each bottle as a unit. A Whole Health System order typically includes 3 units (Fruits + Veggies + Fiber & Spice).
No. The settlement limits recovery to one claim per household, even if purchases were made through multiple accounts.
Not always. The claim form allows approximate purchase date(s), especially for claims without proof.
If total valid claims and costs exceed the settlement cap, payments are reduced proportionally so the total paid does not exceed the agreed maximum.
Payments have a limited window typically 90-180 days. If a check is not cashed in time (or can’t be delivered and you don’t update your info), you may lose the payment.
A notable feature is that unclaimed funds revert to the company, rather than going to a charity or consumer-protection organization—so filing matters if you want a share.
CHIMO
Class Actions
Unclaimed Property
Sign up for updates on new lawsuits
and unclaimed money opportunities
© 2025 Chimo - All rights reserved.