
The claim deadline passed on March 10, 2026. New claims for this settlement are no longer being accepted.
Payments come after approval, and after any appeals. Anyone who objected to the settlement can ask a higher court to look at it again — an appeal — and that has to finish first. Eligible payments are sent once approval is final, and the stretch from a claim deadline to money in hand often runs a year or more. It varies from one settlement to the next.
Filed this claim with Chimo? The status of your claim is on the claims page in your account.


Vernita Morris sued the company behind Balance of Nature, saying it misled consumers about the health benefits, ingredient quality, and nutritional value of its supplements. Evig denies any wrongdoing, and the court did not decide who was right.
She sued on behalf of consumers who bought Balance of Nature Fruits, Veggies, and Fiber & Spice products. The case (Morris v. Evig, LLC d/b/a Balance of Nature, Case No. 25PH-CV-01551) was filed on September 4, 2025, in the Circuit Court of Phelps County, Missouri.
The lawsuit says that marketing and advertising overstated “proven” health benefits and premium ingredient representations, causing consumers to overpay. Its legal claims include deceptive trade practices, breaches of warranties, fraud by silence, and unjust enrichment.
The settlement grew out of negotiations that began in spring 2024 in an earlier case, Powell v. Evig, which was dismissed in favor of this one, and the settlement agreement was signed in late September 2025. Class counsel from multiple firms negotiated a $9.95 million settlement fund, with the terms set out in the settlement agreement and claim documents filed in the case docket.
Balance of Nature agreed to resolve the lawsuit primarily through a nationwide $9.95 million cash settlement, rather than admitting wrongdoing or committing to specific labeling or marketing changes. The company agreed to compensate eligible consumers who purchased Balance of Nature Fruits, Veggies, or Fiber & Spice supplements during the class period, using a two-tier claims structure that allowed claims with or without proof of purchase.
A notable feature of this settlement is its household-based cap, limiting recovery to one claim per household, regardless of how many products were purchased. The settlement also allowed flexible proof, including online order histories from Balance of Nature, Amazon, or Walmart, making it easier for consumers to qualify. Claims were subject to auditing to prevent fraud, but no medical harm or product defect had to be shown—only qualifying purchases.
Another notable aspect is that any unclaimed settlement funds stay with the company, rather than being distributed to third-party charities. The settlement also expressly excludes personal injury claims, focusing solely on alleged deceptive advertising and marketing practices.
Consumers wondering how much could I get from the Balance of Nature Supplements lawsuit should know the payout structure is standardized by unit and by household.
Eligible class members could receive up to $30 per household: up to $6 per unit for up to five units with proof of purchase, or up to $4 per unit for up to two units without proof. Payments could be less, depending on how many valid claims were submitted overall.
The per-unit amounts are set by the settlement and apply regardless of the price paid. They are not a full product refund. The lawsuit says consumers overpaid because of the marketing, and Evig denies it.
The maximum unit limits are a key feature:
The case also uses a one-claim-per-household rule: all claims from the same household are treated as a single claim, including for proof of purchase.
Under the settlement, payments to eligible claimants were to go out about 45 days after final approval is no longer subject to appeal. A final approval hearing was scheduled for March 6, 2026. Delays are common due to court schedules and verification processes.



Consumers qualified under Balance of Nature Supplements class action eligibility if they purchased certain products during the class period. The claim form asked targeted questions to confirm Balance of Nature Supplements class action claimants met the settlement's criteria.
The eligibility rules in this case come from the settlement agreement the parties negotiated and the court preliminarily approved.
First, eligibility is tied to buying specific products in the U.S. during a defined time window, March 28, 2019, to October 27, 2025, because the lawsuit alleges economic overpayment caused by advertising, not physical injury. Personal injury claims are not released by the settlement.
Second, only one claim per household is eligible. All claims from the same household are treated as a single claim, including for meeting the proof of purchase requirements.
Third, the proof and no-proof tiers balance access and accuracy. A claim with proof of purchase could cover up to five units at up to $6 each, while a claim without proof could cover up to two units at up to $4 each, so consumers who no longer had records could still take part.
Finally, people who bought the products for resale, or who already received a refund equal to or more than what they paid, are excluded from the class.
Yes. Purchases made via Amazon or Walmart qualified, and claimants could use order confirmations or account order history as proof.
The settlement counts each bottle as a unit. A single purchase of the Whole Health System includes one bottle each of Fruits, Veggies, and Fiber & Spice, so it counts as 3 units.
No. The settlement limits recovery to one claim per household, even if purchases were made through multiple accounts.
Not always. The claim form allowed approximate purchase date(s), especially for claims without proof.
If total valid claims and costs exceed the settlement cap, payments are reduced proportionally so the total paid does not exceed the agreed maximum.
Benefit checks were subject to a 90-day void period, after which they could no longer be cashed. If a check is not cashed in time (or can’t be delivered and you don’t update your info), you may lose the payment.
A notable feature is that unclaimed funds stay with the company, rather than going to a charity or consumer-protection organization—so only people who filed valid claims could receive a share.
Balance of Nature is a trade name of Evig, LLC, a privately held company based in St. George, Utah, that was founded in the late 1990s by Douglas Howard, a chiropractor.