YouTube TV Class Action Lawsuit
Disney allegedly used its control of ESPN to force streaming services to raise YouTube TV and DirecTV Stream prices. Disney denies it and settled for $50 million.
What happens next with the YouTube TV settlement
The claim deadline passed on September 5, 2026. New claims for this settlement are no longer being accepted.
A judge has not approved the settlement yet. That decision comes at a court hearing set for January 14, 2027, called the final approval hearing. Nothing is paid out before it.
Payments come after approval, and after any appeals. Anyone who objected to the settlement can ask a higher court to look at it again — an appeal — and that has to finish first. Eligible payments are sent once approval is final, and the stretch from a claim deadline to money in hand often runs a year or more. It varies from one settlement to the next.
Filed this claim with Chimo? The status of your claim is on the claims page in your account.
Settlements you can still claim in November 2026
Visa & Mastercard
$380
Generic Drug Makers (State AGs)
$59
Neutrogena (Illinois Only)
$731
YouTube TV Class Action Lawsuit
Live-TV streaming subscribers sued The Walt Disney Company, saying it used its control of ESPN, the single most expensive channel in any live-TV bundle, to push streaming prices back up to old cable levels. Heather Biddle and other subscribers sued in 2022, and their claims were folded into a Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint filed on October 18, 2023.
The claims center on Disney's carriage agreements: the subscribers say Disney leveraged ESPN's "must-have" status to force streaming distributors like YouTube TV, DirecTV Stream, and Hulu + Live TV to carry its full slate of networks in their base packages, inflating what consumers paid. The claims are brought under Section 1 of the Sherman Act and Sections 4 and 16 of the Clayton Act, alongside roughly a dozen state antitrust and consumer-protection statutes including the California Cartwright Act and the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act.
Disney denies the allegations and any wrongdoing, and the court has not decided who is right. This is a partial settlement: subscribers of FuboTV, who sued Disney in the same case, have not settled. Bathaee Dunne LLP and Korein Tillery P.C. represent the subscribers in the case (Biddle v. The Walt Disney Company, No. 5:22-cv-07317-EJD).
YouTube TV Class Action Settlement - $50,000,000
Disney has agreed to a $50 million YouTube TV settlement that resolves the YouTube TV and DirecTV Stream antitrust claims — a partial settlement, since the FuboTV plaintiffs in the same litigation have not settled. The DirecTV Stream lawsuit settlement amount is an all-cash, non-reversionary fund: once approved, no money returns to Disney, even if some of it goes unclaimed.
Coverage for Disney settlement eligibility ran to anyone who purchased a YouTube TV subscription, or a DirecTV Stream subscription (including its former DirecTV Now and AT&T TV Now branding), between April 1, 2019, and March 31, 2026. After notice costs, administration, attorneys' fees, and service awards are deducted, the remaining net settlement fund is split by geography — 90% to class members who lived in an antitrust "repealer" jurisdiction during the class period, and 10% to everyone else.
Beyond the cash, Disney agreed to three years of business-practice commitments: it will consider smaller, genre-based bundle options when distributors request them, and maintain internal information walls between its negotiating teams. The deadline to file a claim was September 8, 2026. New claims can no longer be filed. A final approval hearing is scheduled for January 14, 2027.
Claims closed: September 5, 2026
Streaming Class Action Payout
There is no fixed per-person check here, which is the first thing to understand about the YouTube TV settlement amount per person: payments are pro rata, meaning the fund is divided in proportion to how long each eligible claimant subscribed and how many people filed. The claim form sorted subscription length into bands from "less than one year" up to "six years or more," and longer-term subscribers are eligible for a larger share.
The settlement documents give no estimate of what a claim is worth. What moves the number is where the class member lived (90% of the net fund is set aside for repealer jurisdictions), how long they subscribed, and how many valid claims are filed, after attorneys' fees of up to $15 million, costs and service awards come out of the $50 million. Payments are made to eligible claimants after final approval; the final approval hearing is scheduled for January 14, 2027.
Streaming Class Action Eligibility
You were covered if you paid for YouTube TV or DirecTV Stream during the class period — but where you lived mattered more than usual here, because the settlement allocates 90% of the net fund to residents of antitrust "repealer" jurisdictions and only 10% to everyone else, so two people with identical subscriptions can be eligible for very different amounts.
FAQ
The net fund is split 90 to 10. Class members who lived in an antitrust "repealer" jurisdiction at any time during the class period — 36 states, the District of Columbia, Guam and Puerto Rico, from California to New York — share 90% of the money; everyone in the remaining states splits 10%.
Plaintiffs allege ESPN is the costliest input in any live-TV package, and that Disney used carriage agreements to require streamers to bundle it into base tiers — pushing prices back toward pre-cord-cutting cable levels.
No. Disney denies all wrongdoing and liability, and no court has found that it violated any law. It agreed to settle to avoid the cost and risk of continued litigation.
Yes. Those who subscribed to both could submit one claim form that listed both subscriptions, and be eligible for a payment for each rather than having to choose.
Yes. The DirecTV Stream class expressly includes its earlier brand names, DirecTV Now and AT&T TV Now, so subscriptions under those labels qualify during the class period.
Class counsel planned to request up to 30% of the gross fund — as much as $15 million — plus reasonable costs. The court can award less, and any fees come out of the $50 million.
It never goes back to Disney. Leftover funds can be redistributed among claimants, donated to a court-approved cy pres recipient, or escheated to state or federal governments.
This is a partial settlement. The FuboTV plaintiffs in the same consolidated litigation did not settle with Disney, so FuboTV subscriptions are not covered and those claims continue separately.
For three years after final approval, Disney will consider offering distributors smaller genre-based bundles instead of all-or-nothing carriage, and will keep information walls between its network-negotiation and affiliated-streamer teams.
Sources
These are the court's own records for this case. They are hosted here unchanged, so you can check anything on this page against the documents themselves.
- YouTube TV Class Action Settlement Agreement (PDF) Settlement agreement · Filed March 5, 2026 · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Jose Division) · Case 5:22-cv-07317-EJD
- YouTube TV Order Preliminarily Approving Class Action Settlement and Issuance of Notice (PDF) Court order · Filed March 31, 2026 · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Jose Division) · Case 5:22-cv-07317-EJD
- YouTube TV Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint (PDF) Complaint · Filed October 18, 2023 · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Jose Division) · Case 5:22-cv-07317-EJD
The full case file is on the court docket: view the docket.